|
References (1):CHMC 2003. Clean-up Procedures for Mold in Houses. Revised ed. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. ISBN: 0-660-19227-6.Chung, Y. J., Coates, N. H., Viana, M. E., Copeland, L., Vesper, S. J., Selgrade, M. K., Ward, M. D. W. 2005. Dose-dependent allergic responses to an extract of Penicillium chrysogenum in BALB/c mice. Toxicology 209: 77-89.d'Halewyn, M. A., Leclerc, J. M., King, N., Bélanger, M., Legris, M. and Frenette, Y., 2002. Les risques à la santé associés à la présence de moisissures en milieu intérieur. Québec : Institut national de santé publique du Québec. 105 p. + appendices.Health Canada 1995. Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: a Guide to Recognition and Management. Ottawa: Health Canada.Health Canada 2004. Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: Health Effects and Investigation Methods. Ottawa: Health Canada. ISBN 0-662-37432-0. 47 p.Jaakkola, J. J. K., Hwang, B. F., Jaakkola, N. 2005. Home dampness and molds, parental atopy, and asthma in childhood: a six-year population-based cohort study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 113: 357-361.Rand, T. G., Giles, S., Flemming, J., Miller, J. D., Puniani, E. 2005. Inflammatory and cytotoxic responses in mouse lungs exposed to purified toxins from building isolated Penicillium brevicompactum Dierckx and P. chrysogenum Thom. Toxicological Sciences 87: 213-222.Wickman, M., Melen, E., Berglind, N., Lennart Nordvall, S., Almqvist, C., Kull, I., Svartengren, M., Pershagen, G. 2003. Strategies for preventing wheezing and asthma in small children. Allergy 58: 742-747.
References (2)1.Kozak, P.P., Gallup, J., Commins, L.H., and Gillman, S.A. Currently available methods for home mold surveys. II. Examples of problem homes surveyed. Ann. Allergy, 45: 167 (1980).2.Sayer, W., Shean, D.B., and Ghosseiri, J. Estimation of airborne fungal flora by the Andersen sampler versus the gravity settling culture plate. J. Allergy, 44: 214 (1969). 3.Buttner, M.P. and Stetzenbach, L.D. Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on airsampling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59: 219 (1993) [erratum notice: Appi. Environ.Microbiol., 59: 1694 (1993)].4. Verhoeff, A.P., van Wijnen, J.H., Brunekreef, B., Fischer, P., van Reenen-Hoekstra, ES.,and Samson, R.A. Presence of viable mold propagules in indoor air in relation to house damp and outdoor air. Allergy, 47: 83 (1992). 5.Good, I.J. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40: 237 (1953).6.Gochenaur, S.E. Fungi of a Long Island oak—birch forest. II. Population dynamics and hydrolase patterns of the soil penicillia. Mycologia, 76: 218 (1984).7.Hyvarinen, A., Reponen, T., Husman, T., Ruuskanen, J., and Nevalainen, A. Composition of fungal flora in mold problem houses determined with four different methods. In: Indoor air ‘93, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate. Vol. 4. Particles, microbes, radon. P. Kalliokoski, M. Jantunen, and 0. Seppanen (eds.). Helsinki. p. 273 (1993). 8.Solomon, W.R. Assessing fungus prevalence in domestic interiors. J. Allergy Clin.Immunol., 56: 235 (1975).9.Verhoeff, A.P., van Wijnen, J.H., Boleij, J.S.M., Brunekreef, B., van Reenen-Hoekstra,E.S., and Samson, R.A. Enumeration and identification of airborne viable mold propagulesin houses: a field comparison of selected techniques. Allergy, 45: 275 1990).10.Kapyla, M. Frame fungi on insulated windows. Allergy, 40: 558 (1985).11.Muilenberg, M.L. Aeroallergen assessment by microscopy and culture. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am., 9:245(1989).12.Blomquist, G., Palmgren, V., and Strom, G. Improved techniques for sampling airborne fungal particles in highly contaminated environments. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 10:253 (1984).13.Miller, J.D. Fungi and the building engineer. In: IAQ ‘92, Environments for people. M.Geshwiler (ed.).SHRAE, Atlanta, GA (1993).14. Smid, T., Schokkin, E., Boleij, J.S., and Heederik, D. Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media. Am. md. Hyg. Assoc. J.,50: 235 (1989).15.Thorne, P.S., Kiekenhaefer, M.S., Whitten, P., and Donham, K.J. Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine. App!. Environ. Microbiol., 58: 2543(1992).16.Pasanen, A.L., Kalliokoski, 0., Pasanen, P., Salmi, T., and Tossavainen, A. Fungi carriedfrom farmers’ work into farm homes. Am. md. Hyg. Assoc. J., 50: 631 (1989).17.Miller, J.D. Fungi as contaminants in indoor air. Atmos. Environ., 26A: 2163 (1992).18.Burge, H.A., Chatigny, M., Feeley, J., Kreiss, K., Morey, P., Otten, J., and Petersen, K.Guidelines for assessment and sampling of saprophytic bioaerosols in the indoor environment. App!. md. Hyg., 9: 10 (1987).19. van Reenen-Hoekstra, E.S., Samson, R.A., Verhoeff, A.P., van Wijnen, J.H., and Brunekreef, B. Detection and identification of molds in Dutch houses and non-industrial working environments. Grana, 30: 418 (1991).20.Morring, K.L., Sorenson, W.G., and Attfield, M.D. Sampling for airborne fungi: a statistical comparison of media. Am. md. Hyg. Assoc. J., 44: 662 (1983).21.Littman, M.L. Growth of pathogenic fungi on a new culture medium. Tech. Bull. Reg.Med. Tech., 18: 409 (1948).
|